-----------------------MS Excel: I need to consolidate multiple orders placed by the same companyWant to use...

Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?

Books on the History of math research at European universities

Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?

What does the "3am" section means in manpages?

In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales were already rare?

Does "Dominei" mean something?

I2C signal and power over long range (10meter cable)

How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?

Should a half Jewish man be discouraged from marrying a Jewess?

How do I repair my stair bannister?

Lifted its hind leg on or lifted its hind leg towards?

Visiting the UK as unmarried couple

Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?

What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?

Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?

Is infinity mathematically observable?

What to do when my ideas aren't chosen, when I strongly disagree with the chosen solution?

Was the picture area of a CRT a parallelogram (instead of a true rectangle)?

Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?

Greatest common substring

How to deal with or prevent idle in the test team?

What if somebody invests in my application?

How can I successfully establish a nationwide combat training program for a large country?

Science Fiction story where a man invents a machine that can help him watch history unfold



-----------------------


MS Excel: I need to consolidate multiple orders placed by the same companyWant to use dates as headers in a table but need two instances of the same dateVBA Lookup by Multiple Criteria - Then Copy & PasteKeep Specific Columns From Repeating in ExcelExcel - find multiple pieces of data in several different columns at onceCalculate/determine in MS Excel which filetype/product has been ordered first (complex table)Analyzing blood transfusion data; orders versus actual transfusions; Microsoft Excel 2010Pulling subset of data from Master sheet to individual sheets based on criteria, without using VBAFormula based around datessum/group days by week and year













2















Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted










share|improve this question









New contributor




Deasasss is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • what I've realized that, before accept New order the Date should be tested if hasn't find within 6 months then okay. But unable to understand second one,, "A reorder would be if the customer had purchased that specific product in the past 6 months". seems both are contradictions!!

    – Rajesh S
    Mar 22 at 7:19











  • Cont... or would you like to set 2 Criteria for New Order,, 1. Date and 2. Product !!

    – Rajesh S
    Mar 22 at 7:21
















2















Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted










share|improve this question









New contributor




Deasasss is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • what I've realized that, before accept New order the Date should be tested if hasn't find within 6 months then okay. But unable to understand second one,, "A reorder would be if the customer had purchased that specific product in the past 6 months". seems both are contradictions!!

    – Rajesh S
    Mar 22 at 7:19











  • Cont... or would you like to set 2 Criteria for New Order,, 1. Date and 2. Product !!

    – Rajesh S
    Mar 22 at 7:21














2












2








2








Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted










share|improve this question









New contributor




Deasasss is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted







microsoft-excel worksheet-function microsoft-excel-2016






share|improve this question









New contributor




Deasasss is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Deasasss is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 min ago







Deasasss













New contributor




Deasasss is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 21 at 21:17









DeasasssDeasasss

111




111




New contributor




Deasasss is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Deasasss is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Deasasss is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • what I've realized that, before accept New order the Date should be tested if hasn't find within 6 months then okay. But unable to understand second one,, "A reorder would be if the customer had purchased that specific product in the past 6 months". seems both are contradictions!!

    – Rajesh S
    Mar 22 at 7:19











  • Cont... or would you like to set 2 Criteria for New Order,, 1. Date and 2. Product !!

    – Rajesh S
    Mar 22 at 7:21



















  • what I've realized that, before accept New order the Date should be tested if hasn't find within 6 months then okay. But unable to understand second one,, "A reorder would be if the customer had purchased that specific product in the past 6 months". seems both are contradictions!!

    – Rajesh S
    Mar 22 at 7:19











  • Cont... or would you like to set 2 Criteria for New Order,, 1. Date and 2. Product !!

    – Rajesh S
    Mar 22 at 7:21

















what I've realized that, before accept New order the Date should be tested if hasn't find within 6 months then okay. But unable to understand second one,, "A reorder would be if the customer had purchased that specific product in the past 6 months". seems both are contradictions!!

– Rajesh S
Mar 22 at 7:19





what I've realized that, before accept New order the Date should be tested if hasn't find within 6 months then okay. But unable to understand second one,, "A reorder would be if the customer had purchased that specific product in the past 6 months". seems both are contradictions!!

– Rajesh S
Mar 22 at 7:19













Cont... or would you like to set 2 Criteria for New Order,, 1. Date and 2. Product !!

– Rajesh S
Mar 22 at 7:21





Cont... or would you like to set 2 Criteria for New Order,, 1. Date and 2. Product !!

– Rajesh S
Mar 22 at 7:21










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














Perhaps I’m misunderstanding something, but this seems to be fairly simple. 
My understanding of the question is that a row represents a reorder
if there is at least one row above the current one
that has the same Customer Name (Column B) as the current row,
the same Product Name (Column D), and a Transaction Date (Column A)
within the past six months of the current Transaction Date. 
Columns C, E and F can be ignored. 
I assume that the rows are sorted by Transaction Date
(although I guess I don’t need to make that assumption).



The Transaction Date criterion is the “hardest” (I use that term loosely). 
A past date is within the past six months of A2 if it is



> EDATE(A2,-6)


So, to count the rows through the current one
that satisfy the three criteria, we use



=COUNTIFS(A$2:A2, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), B$2:B2, B2, D$2:D2, D2)


The A$2:A2 notation is interesting. 
It represents a range that starts in Row 2 and ends in the current row;
i.e., everything up through (and including) the current row. 
This count will always be at least 1, because the current row counts. 
If it’s greater than 1,
there was at least one previous row that also matched. 
So the answer is to enter



=IF(COUNTIFS(A$2:A2, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), B$2:B2, B2, D$2:D2, D2)<=1, "New Order", "Reorder")


into H2 (or wherever you want it) and drag/fill down.



spreadsheet showing the count and the interpretation of the count





If the rows might be out of order, we need to search the entire table
and test that the date is less than the current date:



=IF(COUNTIFS(A$2:A$99, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), A$2:A$99, "<" & A2,
B$2:B$99, B2, D$2:D$99, D2)=0, "New Order", "Reorder")


where I’m using 99 to represent the last row of the data. 
I changed the test from <=1 to =0
because the < A2 test eliminates the current row. 
If your data might include multiple rows
with the same Customer Name and Product Name,
and the exact same Transaction Date,
please specify how they should be handled.






share|improve this answer































    0














    Oh, you're gonna love this one.



    I'll break it down into steps because the final formula is going to be fairly complex.



    Setup



    I created a worksheet in the format you specified. I've added three columns to piece out what we need to do, which I'll describe individually below. Note that I've frozen the top row and scrolled down a bit in this first screenshot.



    worksheet



    Step 1: Establish range to search



    First we need to know when 6 months ago was (and where in the spreadsheet that date is located). In each record, we'll use EDATE to find out.



    In cell G2:



    VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE)



    This is great - this gives us the last sales record we have that was more than 6 months ago. Note that if you have infrequent sales (ie. big gaps between sales records), the way that I've written this does mean you might 'catch' false positives, if the last order of the item in question was, say, 6 months and a week ago AND there were no orders at all between 6 months and a week ago and exactly 6 weeks ago. I decided this was 'close enough' for you.



    The only other flaw is there are some unpleasing-looking errors near the top of the sheet, because for the first record (ie. row 2) there are no 6-months-ago records at all. So let's wrap with an IFERROR:



    =IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2)



    In other words, tell me when the most recent order more than 6 months ago was, unless there isn't one, in which case just give me the first order we have record of.



    This formula copies down. That's here:



    helper1



    Step 2: Turn that range-starting data into a cell location



    In cell H2:



    =MATCH(G2,A:A,0)



    This one's easy. In what ordinal location in column A do we find the 6-months-ago date we established in Step 1?



    This formula copies down. Here we are:



    helper2



    Step 3: Do it



    Let's skip ahead and put this into, how about, I21, so we can see how it works.



    =INDEX(INDIRECT("A"&H21&":D"&ROW()-1),MATCH(D21,INDIRECT("D"&H21&":D"&ROW()-1),0),1)



    This is, at base, just a simple INDEX MATCH search. But what we've done is replace the cell references of the arrays of those functions with INDIRECT references to the value we just seeded into column H.



    In my sample data, row 21 is a sales record with a date of 10/1/2018. Column G finds the most recent sales record more than 6 months prior to that date, which in my sample date happens to be 4/1/2018. Column H pegs the (first) location of that date in column A at the 8th row. Thus INDIRECT("A"&H21& says to start the array for the search at the row in A identified by the value in H. Nice! And the other half of the INDIRECT, ":D"&ROW()-1) says to end the array at the row in D that's one row above the record we're presently in.



    In other words, you could write



    =INDEX(A1:D999,MATCH(D21,D1:D9999,0),1)



    To find the first incidence of your product code in D over the ENTIRE sales ledger - but we don't want to do that. So we replace the cell references with dynamic ranges that we've used the previous two steps to generate. With me?



    So that looks like this:



    find match



    Once we copy that formula (wrapped in another IFERROR for appearances) up to row 2 and back down, you've got:



    Frankenstein



    There's a false positive on the first row. I'm going to live with that, too.



    Step 4: Combine



    So the formula in I references H, which references G. Reverse expansion nets a final formula that reads:



    =IFERROR(INDEX(INDIRECT("A"&MATCH(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2),A:A,0)&":D"&ROW()-1),MATCH(D2,INDIRECT("D"&MATCH(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2),A:A,0)&":D"&ROW()-1),0),1),"NEW ORDER")



    And looks like:



    Grand finale



    So, if you like, you can just copy that formula into your 'reorder' column in row 2 and copy down.



    NB.




    1. You're going to use Format Painter on your output field, because the formulas as written will treat the text dates in A as date serial numbers, and return a serial number as well.

    2. Note the weakness in Step 1 - you can see in the screenshot of the helper1 field in Step 3 that in my sample data, the 6-months-ago date for 10/1 was 4/1 and the 6-months-ago date for 10/5 was also 4/1, because there were no orders at all between 4/1 and 4/5. This could potentially call out false positives.

    3. Again, as discussed in Step 3 there's also going to be a false positive on the first sales record using this method.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Ooh, bad job by me to miss that. I'm sorry! Don't worry about having a lot to learn, this is a fairly advanced request, actually. I can figure a way to integrate the matching of customer and product ID but I won't be able to get to it til Monday.

      – Alex M
      Mar 23 at 0:34











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "3"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Deasasss is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1416113%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Perhaps I’m misunderstanding something, but this seems to be fairly simple. 
    My understanding of the question is that a row represents a reorder
    if there is at least one row above the current one
    that has the same Customer Name (Column B) as the current row,
    the same Product Name (Column D), and a Transaction Date (Column A)
    within the past six months of the current Transaction Date. 
    Columns C, E and F can be ignored. 
    I assume that the rows are sorted by Transaction Date
    (although I guess I don’t need to make that assumption).



    The Transaction Date criterion is the “hardest” (I use that term loosely). 
    A past date is within the past six months of A2 if it is



    > EDATE(A2,-6)


    So, to count the rows through the current one
    that satisfy the three criteria, we use



    =COUNTIFS(A$2:A2, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), B$2:B2, B2, D$2:D2, D2)


    The A$2:A2 notation is interesting. 
    It represents a range that starts in Row 2 and ends in the current row;
    i.e., everything up through (and including) the current row. 
    This count will always be at least 1, because the current row counts. 
    If it’s greater than 1,
    there was at least one previous row that also matched. 
    So the answer is to enter



    =IF(COUNTIFS(A$2:A2, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), B$2:B2, B2, D$2:D2, D2)<=1, "New Order", "Reorder")


    into H2 (or wherever you want it) and drag/fill down.



    spreadsheet showing the count and the interpretation of the count





    If the rows might be out of order, we need to search the entire table
    and test that the date is less than the current date:



    =IF(COUNTIFS(A$2:A$99, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), A$2:A$99, "<" & A2,
    B$2:B$99, B2, D$2:D$99, D2)=0, "New Order", "Reorder")


    where I’m using 99 to represent the last row of the data. 
    I changed the test from <=1 to =0
    because the < A2 test eliminates the current row. 
    If your data might include multiple rows
    with the same Customer Name and Product Name,
    and the exact same Transaction Date,
    please specify how they should be handled.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      Perhaps I’m misunderstanding something, but this seems to be fairly simple. 
      My understanding of the question is that a row represents a reorder
      if there is at least one row above the current one
      that has the same Customer Name (Column B) as the current row,
      the same Product Name (Column D), and a Transaction Date (Column A)
      within the past six months of the current Transaction Date. 
      Columns C, E and F can be ignored. 
      I assume that the rows are sorted by Transaction Date
      (although I guess I don’t need to make that assumption).



      The Transaction Date criterion is the “hardest” (I use that term loosely). 
      A past date is within the past six months of A2 if it is



      > EDATE(A2,-6)


      So, to count the rows through the current one
      that satisfy the three criteria, we use



      =COUNTIFS(A$2:A2, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), B$2:B2, B2, D$2:D2, D2)


      The A$2:A2 notation is interesting. 
      It represents a range that starts in Row 2 and ends in the current row;
      i.e., everything up through (and including) the current row. 
      This count will always be at least 1, because the current row counts. 
      If it’s greater than 1,
      there was at least one previous row that also matched. 
      So the answer is to enter



      =IF(COUNTIFS(A$2:A2, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), B$2:B2, B2, D$2:D2, D2)<=1, "New Order", "Reorder")


      into H2 (or wherever you want it) and drag/fill down.



      spreadsheet showing the count and the interpretation of the count





      If the rows might be out of order, we need to search the entire table
      and test that the date is less than the current date:



      =IF(COUNTIFS(A$2:A$99, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), A$2:A$99, "<" & A2,
      B$2:B$99, B2, D$2:D$99, D2)=0, "New Order", "Reorder")


      where I’m using 99 to represent the last row of the data. 
      I changed the test from <=1 to =0
      because the < A2 test eliminates the current row. 
      If your data might include multiple rows
      with the same Customer Name and Product Name,
      and the exact same Transaction Date,
      please specify how they should be handled.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        Perhaps I’m misunderstanding something, but this seems to be fairly simple. 
        My understanding of the question is that a row represents a reorder
        if there is at least one row above the current one
        that has the same Customer Name (Column B) as the current row,
        the same Product Name (Column D), and a Transaction Date (Column A)
        within the past six months of the current Transaction Date. 
        Columns C, E and F can be ignored. 
        I assume that the rows are sorted by Transaction Date
        (although I guess I don’t need to make that assumption).



        The Transaction Date criterion is the “hardest” (I use that term loosely). 
        A past date is within the past six months of A2 if it is



        > EDATE(A2,-6)


        So, to count the rows through the current one
        that satisfy the three criteria, we use



        =COUNTIFS(A$2:A2, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), B$2:B2, B2, D$2:D2, D2)


        The A$2:A2 notation is interesting. 
        It represents a range that starts in Row 2 and ends in the current row;
        i.e., everything up through (and including) the current row. 
        This count will always be at least 1, because the current row counts. 
        If it’s greater than 1,
        there was at least one previous row that also matched. 
        So the answer is to enter



        =IF(COUNTIFS(A$2:A2, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), B$2:B2, B2, D$2:D2, D2)<=1, "New Order", "Reorder")


        into H2 (or wherever you want it) and drag/fill down.



        spreadsheet showing the count and the interpretation of the count





        If the rows might be out of order, we need to search the entire table
        and test that the date is less than the current date:



        =IF(COUNTIFS(A$2:A$99, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), A$2:A$99, "<" & A2,
        B$2:B$99, B2, D$2:D$99, D2)=0, "New Order", "Reorder")


        where I’m using 99 to represent the last row of the data. 
        I changed the test from <=1 to =0
        because the < A2 test eliminates the current row. 
        If your data might include multiple rows
        with the same Customer Name and Product Name,
        and the exact same Transaction Date,
        please specify how they should be handled.






        share|improve this answer













        Perhaps I’m misunderstanding something, but this seems to be fairly simple. 
        My understanding of the question is that a row represents a reorder
        if there is at least one row above the current one
        that has the same Customer Name (Column B) as the current row,
        the same Product Name (Column D), and a Transaction Date (Column A)
        within the past six months of the current Transaction Date. 
        Columns C, E and F can be ignored. 
        I assume that the rows are sorted by Transaction Date
        (although I guess I don’t need to make that assumption).



        The Transaction Date criterion is the “hardest” (I use that term loosely). 
        A past date is within the past six months of A2 if it is



        > EDATE(A2,-6)


        So, to count the rows through the current one
        that satisfy the three criteria, we use



        =COUNTIFS(A$2:A2, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), B$2:B2, B2, D$2:D2, D2)


        The A$2:A2 notation is interesting. 
        It represents a range that starts in Row 2 and ends in the current row;
        i.e., everything up through (and including) the current row. 
        This count will always be at least 1, because the current row counts. 
        If it’s greater than 1,
        there was at least one previous row that also matched. 
        So the answer is to enter



        =IF(COUNTIFS(A$2:A2, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), B$2:B2, B2, D$2:D2, D2)<=1, "New Order", "Reorder")


        into H2 (or wherever you want it) and drag/fill down.



        spreadsheet showing the count and the interpretation of the count





        If the rows might be out of order, we need to search the entire table
        and test that the date is less than the current date:



        =IF(COUNTIFS(A$2:A$99, ">" & EDATE(A2,-6), A$2:A$99, "<" & A2,
        B$2:B$99, B2, D$2:D$99, D2)=0, "New Order", "Reorder")


        where I’m using 99 to represent the last row of the data. 
        I changed the test from <=1 to =0
        because the < A2 test eliminates the current row. 
        If your data might include multiple rows
        with the same Customer Name and Product Name,
        and the exact same Transaction Date,
        please specify how they should be handled.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        ScottScott

        16.1k113990




        16.1k113990

























            0














            Oh, you're gonna love this one.



            I'll break it down into steps because the final formula is going to be fairly complex.



            Setup



            I created a worksheet in the format you specified. I've added three columns to piece out what we need to do, which I'll describe individually below. Note that I've frozen the top row and scrolled down a bit in this first screenshot.



            worksheet



            Step 1: Establish range to search



            First we need to know when 6 months ago was (and where in the spreadsheet that date is located). In each record, we'll use EDATE to find out.



            In cell G2:



            VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE)



            This is great - this gives us the last sales record we have that was more than 6 months ago. Note that if you have infrequent sales (ie. big gaps between sales records), the way that I've written this does mean you might 'catch' false positives, if the last order of the item in question was, say, 6 months and a week ago AND there were no orders at all between 6 months and a week ago and exactly 6 weeks ago. I decided this was 'close enough' for you.



            The only other flaw is there are some unpleasing-looking errors near the top of the sheet, because for the first record (ie. row 2) there are no 6-months-ago records at all. So let's wrap with an IFERROR:



            =IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2)



            In other words, tell me when the most recent order more than 6 months ago was, unless there isn't one, in which case just give me the first order we have record of.



            This formula copies down. That's here:



            helper1



            Step 2: Turn that range-starting data into a cell location



            In cell H2:



            =MATCH(G2,A:A,0)



            This one's easy. In what ordinal location in column A do we find the 6-months-ago date we established in Step 1?



            This formula copies down. Here we are:



            helper2



            Step 3: Do it



            Let's skip ahead and put this into, how about, I21, so we can see how it works.



            =INDEX(INDIRECT("A"&H21&":D"&ROW()-1),MATCH(D21,INDIRECT("D"&H21&":D"&ROW()-1),0),1)



            This is, at base, just a simple INDEX MATCH search. But what we've done is replace the cell references of the arrays of those functions with INDIRECT references to the value we just seeded into column H.



            In my sample data, row 21 is a sales record with a date of 10/1/2018. Column G finds the most recent sales record more than 6 months prior to that date, which in my sample date happens to be 4/1/2018. Column H pegs the (first) location of that date in column A at the 8th row. Thus INDIRECT("A"&H21& says to start the array for the search at the row in A identified by the value in H. Nice! And the other half of the INDIRECT, ":D"&ROW()-1) says to end the array at the row in D that's one row above the record we're presently in.



            In other words, you could write



            =INDEX(A1:D999,MATCH(D21,D1:D9999,0),1)



            To find the first incidence of your product code in D over the ENTIRE sales ledger - but we don't want to do that. So we replace the cell references with dynamic ranges that we've used the previous two steps to generate. With me?



            So that looks like this:



            find match



            Once we copy that formula (wrapped in another IFERROR for appearances) up to row 2 and back down, you've got:



            Frankenstein



            There's a false positive on the first row. I'm going to live with that, too.



            Step 4: Combine



            So the formula in I references H, which references G. Reverse expansion nets a final formula that reads:



            =IFERROR(INDEX(INDIRECT("A"&MATCH(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2),A:A,0)&":D"&ROW()-1),MATCH(D2,INDIRECT("D"&MATCH(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2),A:A,0)&":D"&ROW()-1),0),1),"NEW ORDER")



            And looks like:



            Grand finale



            So, if you like, you can just copy that formula into your 'reorder' column in row 2 and copy down.



            NB.




            1. You're going to use Format Painter on your output field, because the formulas as written will treat the text dates in A as date serial numbers, and return a serial number as well.

            2. Note the weakness in Step 1 - you can see in the screenshot of the helper1 field in Step 3 that in my sample data, the 6-months-ago date for 10/1 was 4/1 and the 6-months-ago date for 10/5 was also 4/1, because there were no orders at all between 4/1 and 4/5. This could potentially call out false positives.

            3. Again, as discussed in Step 3 there's also going to be a false positive on the first sales record using this method.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Ooh, bad job by me to miss that. I'm sorry! Don't worry about having a lot to learn, this is a fairly advanced request, actually. I can figure a way to integrate the matching of customer and product ID but I won't be able to get to it til Monday.

              – Alex M
              Mar 23 at 0:34
















            0














            Oh, you're gonna love this one.



            I'll break it down into steps because the final formula is going to be fairly complex.



            Setup



            I created a worksheet in the format you specified. I've added three columns to piece out what we need to do, which I'll describe individually below. Note that I've frozen the top row and scrolled down a bit in this first screenshot.



            worksheet



            Step 1: Establish range to search



            First we need to know when 6 months ago was (and where in the spreadsheet that date is located). In each record, we'll use EDATE to find out.



            In cell G2:



            VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE)



            This is great - this gives us the last sales record we have that was more than 6 months ago. Note that if you have infrequent sales (ie. big gaps between sales records), the way that I've written this does mean you might 'catch' false positives, if the last order of the item in question was, say, 6 months and a week ago AND there were no orders at all between 6 months and a week ago and exactly 6 weeks ago. I decided this was 'close enough' for you.



            The only other flaw is there are some unpleasing-looking errors near the top of the sheet, because for the first record (ie. row 2) there are no 6-months-ago records at all. So let's wrap with an IFERROR:



            =IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2)



            In other words, tell me when the most recent order more than 6 months ago was, unless there isn't one, in which case just give me the first order we have record of.



            This formula copies down. That's here:



            helper1



            Step 2: Turn that range-starting data into a cell location



            In cell H2:



            =MATCH(G2,A:A,0)



            This one's easy. In what ordinal location in column A do we find the 6-months-ago date we established in Step 1?



            This formula copies down. Here we are:



            helper2



            Step 3: Do it



            Let's skip ahead and put this into, how about, I21, so we can see how it works.



            =INDEX(INDIRECT("A"&H21&":D"&ROW()-1),MATCH(D21,INDIRECT("D"&H21&":D"&ROW()-1),0),1)



            This is, at base, just a simple INDEX MATCH search. But what we've done is replace the cell references of the arrays of those functions with INDIRECT references to the value we just seeded into column H.



            In my sample data, row 21 is a sales record with a date of 10/1/2018. Column G finds the most recent sales record more than 6 months prior to that date, which in my sample date happens to be 4/1/2018. Column H pegs the (first) location of that date in column A at the 8th row. Thus INDIRECT("A"&H21& says to start the array for the search at the row in A identified by the value in H. Nice! And the other half of the INDIRECT, ":D"&ROW()-1) says to end the array at the row in D that's one row above the record we're presently in.



            In other words, you could write



            =INDEX(A1:D999,MATCH(D21,D1:D9999,0),1)



            To find the first incidence of your product code in D over the ENTIRE sales ledger - but we don't want to do that. So we replace the cell references with dynamic ranges that we've used the previous two steps to generate. With me?



            So that looks like this:



            find match



            Once we copy that formula (wrapped in another IFERROR for appearances) up to row 2 and back down, you've got:



            Frankenstein



            There's a false positive on the first row. I'm going to live with that, too.



            Step 4: Combine



            So the formula in I references H, which references G. Reverse expansion nets a final formula that reads:



            =IFERROR(INDEX(INDIRECT("A"&MATCH(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2),A:A,0)&":D"&ROW()-1),MATCH(D2,INDIRECT("D"&MATCH(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2),A:A,0)&":D"&ROW()-1),0),1),"NEW ORDER")



            And looks like:



            Grand finale



            So, if you like, you can just copy that formula into your 'reorder' column in row 2 and copy down.



            NB.




            1. You're going to use Format Painter on your output field, because the formulas as written will treat the text dates in A as date serial numbers, and return a serial number as well.

            2. Note the weakness in Step 1 - you can see in the screenshot of the helper1 field in Step 3 that in my sample data, the 6-months-ago date for 10/1 was 4/1 and the 6-months-ago date for 10/5 was also 4/1, because there were no orders at all between 4/1 and 4/5. This could potentially call out false positives.

            3. Again, as discussed in Step 3 there's also going to be a false positive on the first sales record using this method.






            share|improve this answer


























            • Ooh, bad job by me to miss that. I'm sorry! Don't worry about having a lot to learn, this is a fairly advanced request, actually. I can figure a way to integrate the matching of customer and product ID but I won't be able to get to it til Monday.

              – Alex M
              Mar 23 at 0:34














            0












            0








            0







            Oh, you're gonna love this one.



            I'll break it down into steps because the final formula is going to be fairly complex.



            Setup



            I created a worksheet in the format you specified. I've added three columns to piece out what we need to do, which I'll describe individually below. Note that I've frozen the top row and scrolled down a bit in this first screenshot.



            worksheet



            Step 1: Establish range to search



            First we need to know when 6 months ago was (and where in the spreadsheet that date is located). In each record, we'll use EDATE to find out.



            In cell G2:



            VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE)



            This is great - this gives us the last sales record we have that was more than 6 months ago. Note that if you have infrequent sales (ie. big gaps between sales records), the way that I've written this does mean you might 'catch' false positives, if the last order of the item in question was, say, 6 months and a week ago AND there were no orders at all between 6 months and a week ago and exactly 6 weeks ago. I decided this was 'close enough' for you.



            The only other flaw is there are some unpleasing-looking errors near the top of the sheet, because for the first record (ie. row 2) there are no 6-months-ago records at all. So let's wrap with an IFERROR:



            =IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2)



            In other words, tell me when the most recent order more than 6 months ago was, unless there isn't one, in which case just give me the first order we have record of.



            This formula copies down. That's here:



            helper1



            Step 2: Turn that range-starting data into a cell location



            In cell H2:



            =MATCH(G2,A:A,0)



            This one's easy. In what ordinal location in column A do we find the 6-months-ago date we established in Step 1?



            This formula copies down. Here we are:



            helper2



            Step 3: Do it



            Let's skip ahead and put this into, how about, I21, so we can see how it works.



            =INDEX(INDIRECT("A"&H21&":D"&ROW()-1),MATCH(D21,INDIRECT("D"&H21&":D"&ROW()-1),0),1)



            This is, at base, just a simple INDEX MATCH search. But what we've done is replace the cell references of the arrays of those functions with INDIRECT references to the value we just seeded into column H.



            In my sample data, row 21 is a sales record with a date of 10/1/2018. Column G finds the most recent sales record more than 6 months prior to that date, which in my sample date happens to be 4/1/2018. Column H pegs the (first) location of that date in column A at the 8th row. Thus INDIRECT("A"&H21& says to start the array for the search at the row in A identified by the value in H. Nice! And the other half of the INDIRECT, ":D"&ROW()-1) says to end the array at the row in D that's one row above the record we're presently in.



            In other words, you could write



            =INDEX(A1:D999,MATCH(D21,D1:D9999,0),1)



            To find the first incidence of your product code in D over the ENTIRE sales ledger - but we don't want to do that. So we replace the cell references with dynamic ranges that we've used the previous two steps to generate. With me?



            So that looks like this:



            find match



            Once we copy that formula (wrapped in another IFERROR for appearances) up to row 2 and back down, you've got:



            Frankenstein



            There's a false positive on the first row. I'm going to live with that, too.



            Step 4: Combine



            So the formula in I references H, which references G. Reverse expansion nets a final formula that reads:



            =IFERROR(INDEX(INDIRECT("A"&MATCH(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2),A:A,0)&":D"&ROW()-1),MATCH(D2,INDIRECT("D"&MATCH(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2),A:A,0)&":D"&ROW()-1),0),1),"NEW ORDER")



            And looks like:



            Grand finale



            So, if you like, you can just copy that formula into your 'reorder' column in row 2 and copy down.



            NB.




            1. You're going to use Format Painter on your output field, because the formulas as written will treat the text dates in A as date serial numbers, and return a serial number as well.

            2. Note the weakness in Step 1 - you can see in the screenshot of the helper1 field in Step 3 that in my sample data, the 6-months-ago date for 10/1 was 4/1 and the 6-months-ago date for 10/5 was also 4/1, because there were no orders at all between 4/1 and 4/5. This could potentially call out false positives.

            3. Again, as discussed in Step 3 there's also going to be a false positive on the first sales record using this method.






            share|improve this answer















            Oh, you're gonna love this one.



            I'll break it down into steps because the final formula is going to be fairly complex.



            Setup



            I created a worksheet in the format you specified. I've added three columns to piece out what we need to do, which I'll describe individually below. Note that I've frozen the top row and scrolled down a bit in this first screenshot.



            worksheet



            Step 1: Establish range to search



            First we need to know when 6 months ago was (and where in the spreadsheet that date is located). In each record, we'll use EDATE to find out.



            In cell G2:



            VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE)



            This is great - this gives us the last sales record we have that was more than 6 months ago. Note that if you have infrequent sales (ie. big gaps between sales records), the way that I've written this does mean you might 'catch' false positives, if the last order of the item in question was, say, 6 months and a week ago AND there were no orders at all between 6 months and a week ago and exactly 6 weeks ago. I decided this was 'close enough' for you.



            The only other flaw is there are some unpleasing-looking errors near the top of the sheet, because for the first record (ie. row 2) there are no 6-months-ago records at all. So let's wrap with an IFERROR:



            =IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2)



            In other words, tell me when the most recent order more than 6 months ago was, unless there isn't one, in which case just give me the first order we have record of.



            This formula copies down. That's here:



            helper1



            Step 2: Turn that range-starting data into a cell location



            In cell H2:



            =MATCH(G2,A:A,0)



            This one's easy. In what ordinal location in column A do we find the 6-months-ago date we established in Step 1?



            This formula copies down. Here we are:



            helper2



            Step 3: Do it



            Let's skip ahead and put this into, how about, I21, so we can see how it works.



            =INDEX(INDIRECT("A"&H21&":D"&ROW()-1),MATCH(D21,INDIRECT("D"&H21&":D"&ROW()-1),0),1)



            This is, at base, just a simple INDEX MATCH search. But what we've done is replace the cell references of the arrays of those functions with INDIRECT references to the value we just seeded into column H.



            In my sample data, row 21 is a sales record with a date of 10/1/2018. Column G finds the most recent sales record more than 6 months prior to that date, which in my sample date happens to be 4/1/2018. Column H pegs the (first) location of that date in column A at the 8th row. Thus INDIRECT("A"&H21& says to start the array for the search at the row in A identified by the value in H. Nice! And the other half of the INDIRECT, ":D"&ROW()-1) says to end the array at the row in D that's one row above the record we're presently in.



            In other words, you could write



            =INDEX(A1:D999,MATCH(D21,D1:D9999,0),1)



            To find the first incidence of your product code in D over the ENTIRE sales ledger - but we don't want to do that. So we replace the cell references with dynamic ranges that we've used the previous two steps to generate. With me?



            So that looks like this:



            find match



            Once we copy that formula (wrapped in another IFERROR for appearances) up to row 2 and back down, you've got:



            Frankenstein



            There's a false positive on the first row. I'm going to live with that, too.



            Step 4: Combine



            So the formula in I references H, which references G. Reverse expansion nets a final formula that reads:



            =IFERROR(INDEX(INDIRECT("A"&MATCH(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2),A:A,0)&":D"&ROW()-1),MATCH(D2,INDIRECT("D"&MATCH(IFERROR(VLOOKUP(EDATE(A2,-6),A:A,1,TRUE),$A$2),A:A,0)&":D"&ROW()-1),0),1),"NEW ORDER")



            And looks like:



            Grand finale



            So, if you like, you can just copy that formula into your 'reorder' column in row 2 and copy down.



            NB.




            1. You're going to use Format Painter on your output field, because the formulas as written will treat the text dates in A as date serial numbers, and return a serial number as well.

            2. Note the weakness in Step 1 - you can see in the screenshot of the helper1 field in Step 3 that in my sample data, the 6-months-ago date for 10/1 was 4/1 and the 6-months-ago date for 10/5 was also 4/1, because there were no orders at all between 4/1 and 4/5. This could potentially call out false positives.

            3. Again, as discussed in Step 3 there's also going to be a false positive on the first sales record using this method.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 22 at 0:43

























            answered Mar 21 at 23:34









            Alex MAlex M

            509312




            509312













            • Ooh, bad job by me to miss that. I'm sorry! Don't worry about having a lot to learn, this is a fairly advanced request, actually. I can figure a way to integrate the matching of customer and product ID but I won't be able to get to it til Monday.

              – Alex M
              Mar 23 at 0:34



















            • Ooh, bad job by me to miss that. I'm sorry! Don't worry about having a lot to learn, this is a fairly advanced request, actually. I can figure a way to integrate the matching of customer and product ID but I won't be able to get to it til Monday.

              – Alex M
              Mar 23 at 0:34

















            Ooh, bad job by me to miss that. I'm sorry! Don't worry about having a lot to learn, this is a fairly advanced request, actually. I can figure a way to integrate the matching of customer and product ID but I won't be able to get to it til Monday.

            – Alex M
            Mar 23 at 0:34





            Ooh, bad job by me to miss that. I'm sorry! Don't worry about having a lot to learn, this is a fairly advanced request, actually. I can figure a way to integrate the matching of customer and product ID but I won't be able to get to it til Monday.

            – Alex M
            Mar 23 at 0:34










            Deasasss is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Deasasss is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Deasasss is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Deasasss is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1416113%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            VNC viewer RFB protocol error: bad desktop size 0x0I Cannot Type the Key 'd' (lowercase) in VNC Viewer...

            Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Mirandela Referências Menu de...

            looking for continuous Screen Capture for retroactivly reproducing errors, timeback machineRolling desktop...