“on its way” vs. “in its way”Writing two sentences in a short wayI thought you were already goneI...
Am I a Rude Number?
False written accusations not made public - is there law to cover this?
Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?
Why don't key signatures indicate the tonic?
Boss asked me to sign a resignation paper without a date on it along with my new contract
After checking in online, how do I know whether I need to go show my passport at airport check-in?
"We can't save the customer" error after Migration - Magento 2.3
Why publish a research paper when a blog post or a lecture slide can have more citation count than a journal paper?
Do "fields" always combine by addition?
Why did the villain in the first Men in Black movie care about Earth's Cockroaches?
Why did Democrats in the Senate oppose the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (2019 S.130)?
Why does photorec keep finding files after I have filled the disk free space as root?
Why would space fleets be aligned?
How to make ice magic work from a scientific point of view?
Is there any risk in sharing info about technologies and products we use with a supplier?
A Missing Symbol for This Logo
How do I append a character to the end of every line in an excel cell?
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
New package vs new version?
Is there a lava-breathing lizard creature (that could be worshipped by a cult) in 5e?
Which communication protocol is used in AdLib sound card?
Is this ordinary workplace experiences for a job in Software Engineering?
Why are all my replica super soldiers young adults or old teenagers?
Salsa20 Implementation: Sum of 2 Words with Carries Suppressed
“on its way” vs. “in its way”
Writing two sentences in a short wayI thought you were already goneI love how you love meWhen you are going to know indirectly / politely the name of the person you're meeting or talking toIs the word “could” here in the past or present?Is it grammatically correct to say “the baby can't eat himself” meaning that the baby can't eat without help?conditional sentence in the pastPoor aesthetic judgementUK: Is “How do you do?” overly formal in these business situations?Why do we use “any X or Y” and “any X and Y” and are there any exception?
Is “the fire consumed everything on its way” correct?
I thought "on its way" and "in its way" were pretty much equivalent in English and meant pretty much the same thing except in very rare cases. Am I wrong? How do you know which one you should use?
grammar idiomatic-language
|
show 1 more comment
Is “the fire consumed everything on its way” correct?
I thought "on its way" and "in its way" were pretty much equivalent in English and meant pretty much the same thing except in very rare cases. Am I wrong? How do you know which one you should use?
grammar idiomatic-language
2
Replace "on its way" with "in its path" to say what you intended it to mean.
– Erin
11 hours ago
I don't know how to cite an idiomatic-language question's answer. All I can say is, it isn't incorrect, but I'd use "along its path" because that's what I've heard before.
– Mazura
9 hours ago
@Mazura: For example, a native speaker of American English can cite themselves: "To my (American) ear, ________ sounds natural."
– Jasper
8 hours ago
"on it's way" relates to objects in close proximity to the path that it follows. Here "way" is essentially a reference to a physical route, although most would not intuitively see it as meaning this. "in it's way" refers to items BLOCKING it's path or lyong ON the path it took so that the fire passed across or through them.
– Russell McMahon
1 hour ago
1
I'm not sure why you would think "on its way" and "in its way" mean "pretty much the same thing". You can see an apple tree on your way even if you don't see an apple tree in your way...
– user21820
47 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
Is “the fire consumed everything on its way” correct?
I thought "on its way" and "in its way" were pretty much equivalent in English and meant pretty much the same thing except in very rare cases. Am I wrong? How do you know which one you should use?
grammar idiomatic-language
Is “the fire consumed everything on its way” correct?
I thought "on its way" and "in its way" were pretty much equivalent in English and meant pretty much the same thing except in very rare cases. Am I wrong? How do you know which one you should use?
grammar idiomatic-language
grammar idiomatic-language
edited 38 mins ago
J.R.♦
98.9k8127244
98.9k8127244
asked 13 hours ago
repomonsterrepomonster
72313
72313
2
Replace "on its way" with "in its path" to say what you intended it to mean.
– Erin
11 hours ago
I don't know how to cite an idiomatic-language question's answer. All I can say is, it isn't incorrect, but I'd use "along its path" because that's what I've heard before.
– Mazura
9 hours ago
@Mazura: For example, a native speaker of American English can cite themselves: "To my (American) ear, ________ sounds natural."
– Jasper
8 hours ago
"on it's way" relates to objects in close proximity to the path that it follows. Here "way" is essentially a reference to a physical route, although most would not intuitively see it as meaning this. "in it's way" refers to items BLOCKING it's path or lyong ON the path it took so that the fire passed across or through them.
– Russell McMahon
1 hour ago
1
I'm not sure why you would think "on its way" and "in its way" mean "pretty much the same thing". You can see an apple tree on your way even if you don't see an apple tree in your way...
– user21820
47 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
2
Replace "on its way" with "in its path" to say what you intended it to mean.
– Erin
11 hours ago
I don't know how to cite an idiomatic-language question's answer. All I can say is, it isn't incorrect, but I'd use "along its path" because that's what I've heard before.
– Mazura
9 hours ago
@Mazura: For example, a native speaker of American English can cite themselves: "To my (American) ear, ________ sounds natural."
– Jasper
8 hours ago
"on it's way" relates to objects in close proximity to the path that it follows. Here "way" is essentially a reference to a physical route, although most would not intuitively see it as meaning this. "in it's way" refers to items BLOCKING it's path or lyong ON the path it took so that the fire passed across or through them.
– Russell McMahon
1 hour ago
1
I'm not sure why you would think "on its way" and "in its way" mean "pretty much the same thing". You can see an apple tree on your way even if you don't see an apple tree in your way...
– user21820
47 mins ago
2
2
Replace "on its way" with "in its path" to say what you intended it to mean.
– Erin
11 hours ago
Replace "on its way" with "in its path" to say what you intended it to mean.
– Erin
11 hours ago
I don't know how to cite an idiomatic-language question's answer. All I can say is, it isn't incorrect, but I'd use "along its path" because that's what I've heard before.
– Mazura
9 hours ago
I don't know how to cite an idiomatic-language question's answer. All I can say is, it isn't incorrect, but I'd use "along its path" because that's what I've heard before.
– Mazura
9 hours ago
@Mazura: For example, a native speaker of American English can cite themselves: "To my (American) ear, ________ sounds natural."
– Jasper
8 hours ago
@Mazura: For example, a native speaker of American English can cite themselves: "To my (American) ear, ________ sounds natural."
– Jasper
8 hours ago
"on it's way" relates to objects in close proximity to the path that it follows. Here "way" is essentially a reference to a physical route, although most would not intuitively see it as meaning this. "in it's way" refers to items BLOCKING it's path or lyong ON the path it took so that the fire passed across or through them.
– Russell McMahon
1 hour ago
"on it's way" relates to objects in close proximity to the path that it follows. Here "way" is essentially a reference to a physical route, although most would not intuitively see it as meaning this. "in it's way" refers to items BLOCKING it's path or lyong ON the path it took so that the fire passed across or through them.
– Russell McMahon
1 hour ago
1
1
I'm not sure why you would think "on its way" and "in its way" mean "pretty much the same thing". You can see an apple tree on your way even if you don't see an apple tree in your way...
– user21820
47 mins ago
I'm not sure why you would think "on its way" and "in its way" mean "pretty much the same thing". You can see an apple tree on your way even if you don't see an apple tree in your way...
– user21820
47 mins ago
|
show 1 more comment
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
They are not equivalent. "On the way" means that the location or object is along, adjacent to, or near some route.
If we're going to John's house, can we stop by the store to pick up some snacks? It's on the way.
"In the way" means that the location or object is directly in the path or blocking that route.
You used to be able to see the ocean from that hotel, but recently they built a larger hotel that's in the way.
Another way to think about it is that something "on the way" is convenient, while something "in the way" is an obstruction. It's possible to have both in the same sentence:
On the way to Lauren's house out in the country, we were delayed by a herd of cows that were in the way.
Moreover, "on the way" only really makes sense when talking about something related to people, or other entities that have the ability for conscious choice, even if it's only to specify some point of interest.
The restaurant is on the way to our hotel, if you want to stop for a quick bite.
"Fire" would not qualify, as it is mindless. A fire would not stop at a corner store to pick up a bag of chips (a.k.a. crisps) on its way to burn a town. Instead it might burn down the store, if it was in the way, which is what you should use in this case:
The fire consumed everything in its way.
I can't think of any case where you can freely substitute one for the other without changing the meaning.
(Edit) In the case where you're talking about a conscious entity acting as a destructive force (such as an army), which you use depends on what you want to say. For example, if you want to imply the army was engaged in wanton destruction then, as with fire, "in the way" makes more sense.
During the march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way.
On the other hand, if you want to imply the army was consciously selecting targets for destruction, then "on the way" would work:
During the march south, the Union army deliberately torched railways, supply caches, farms, factories, and anything else on the way that might be of strategic value to the Confederates.
If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?
– repomonster
12 hours ago
1
@repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."
– Andrew
12 hours ago
1
@repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"
– Andrew
12 hours ago
2
It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.
– David Schwartz
12 hours ago
This could make sense within context of a longer sentence or paragraph: "They had hoped some crops would survive as the inferno progressed from the barn to the farmhouse, but the fire consumed everything on its way" - however, the important qualifier here is that we know the destination, even if it is not explicitly stated a second time: "the fire consumed everything on its way [from the barn to the farmhouse]"
– Chronocidal
2 hours ago
add a comment |
They can mean similar things in many cases, but they are definitely not always the same. For instance, 'in' can mean 'inside [of]' while 'on' can mean 'on top [of]'. There are too many use cases to explain. You pretty much have to know them all in a case by case sort of way.
In your example, they mean different things, but the effect could be similar.
'The fire consumed everything in its way' means that the fire burned everything that was blocking its path.
On the other hand, 'The fire consumed everything on its way' literally could mean 'everything' (rather than just everything in its path). However, people would probably understand your intent.
Doing something on the way doesn't have to mean that the direct object is nearby: e.g. 'I called my friend on my way to the dentist.' Your friend could be in another country.
A fire could destroy things far away on its way, too. For instance, the destruction of a bomb factory in its path could blow up the whole town on its way. I think it would be reasonable to say the fire destroyed the town, but people could argue that. Or a fire might cause a beam to fall that triggers a switch that makes a rocket launch that causes who knows what else to happen. Anything the fire could do during its journey could be done on its way.
However, when it comes to humans, there is sometimes a context that implies convenience, as Andrew mentioned (but that context doesn't always exist). For instance, "Since you're already going to Chicago, will you pick up some stuff for me on the way?" That's about convenience, while, "I called my mother on the way" isn't necessarily.
It's pretty common for 'in' and 'on' to mean different things.
I feel like the fire would only be consuming things on its way if it had an apparent destination. "The fire went straight for the gas company, and consumed everything on its way." Other than this nit, I prefer your answer, because it feels like it speaks more directly to the OP's example.
– Ed Grimm
11 hours ago
add a comment |
They are not identical in meaning, but the outcome MAY be the same.
"on it's way" relates to objects in close proximity to the path that it follows.
Here
- "way" is essentially a reference to a physical route, although most would not intuitively see it as meaning this.
- "on" means "in immediate proximity to", besides.
"in it's way" refers to items BLOCKING it's path or lying ON (rather than next to) the path it took so that the fire passed across or through them.
Here
- "way" is again a reference to the physical path taken.
- "in" means blocking, occupying, lying across.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198374%2fon-its-way-vs-in-its-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
They are not equivalent. "On the way" means that the location or object is along, adjacent to, or near some route.
If we're going to John's house, can we stop by the store to pick up some snacks? It's on the way.
"In the way" means that the location or object is directly in the path or blocking that route.
You used to be able to see the ocean from that hotel, but recently they built a larger hotel that's in the way.
Another way to think about it is that something "on the way" is convenient, while something "in the way" is an obstruction. It's possible to have both in the same sentence:
On the way to Lauren's house out in the country, we were delayed by a herd of cows that were in the way.
Moreover, "on the way" only really makes sense when talking about something related to people, or other entities that have the ability for conscious choice, even if it's only to specify some point of interest.
The restaurant is on the way to our hotel, if you want to stop for a quick bite.
"Fire" would not qualify, as it is mindless. A fire would not stop at a corner store to pick up a bag of chips (a.k.a. crisps) on its way to burn a town. Instead it might burn down the store, if it was in the way, which is what you should use in this case:
The fire consumed everything in its way.
I can't think of any case where you can freely substitute one for the other without changing the meaning.
(Edit) In the case where you're talking about a conscious entity acting as a destructive force (such as an army), which you use depends on what you want to say. For example, if you want to imply the army was engaged in wanton destruction then, as with fire, "in the way" makes more sense.
During the march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way.
On the other hand, if you want to imply the army was consciously selecting targets for destruction, then "on the way" would work:
During the march south, the Union army deliberately torched railways, supply caches, farms, factories, and anything else on the way that might be of strategic value to the Confederates.
If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?
– repomonster
12 hours ago
1
@repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."
– Andrew
12 hours ago
1
@repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"
– Andrew
12 hours ago
2
It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.
– David Schwartz
12 hours ago
This could make sense within context of a longer sentence or paragraph: "They had hoped some crops would survive as the inferno progressed from the barn to the farmhouse, but the fire consumed everything on its way" - however, the important qualifier here is that we know the destination, even if it is not explicitly stated a second time: "the fire consumed everything on its way [from the barn to the farmhouse]"
– Chronocidal
2 hours ago
add a comment |
They are not equivalent. "On the way" means that the location or object is along, adjacent to, or near some route.
If we're going to John's house, can we stop by the store to pick up some snacks? It's on the way.
"In the way" means that the location or object is directly in the path or blocking that route.
You used to be able to see the ocean from that hotel, but recently they built a larger hotel that's in the way.
Another way to think about it is that something "on the way" is convenient, while something "in the way" is an obstruction. It's possible to have both in the same sentence:
On the way to Lauren's house out in the country, we were delayed by a herd of cows that were in the way.
Moreover, "on the way" only really makes sense when talking about something related to people, or other entities that have the ability for conscious choice, even if it's only to specify some point of interest.
The restaurant is on the way to our hotel, if you want to stop for a quick bite.
"Fire" would not qualify, as it is mindless. A fire would not stop at a corner store to pick up a bag of chips (a.k.a. crisps) on its way to burn a town. Instead it might burn down the store, if it was in the way, which is what you should use in this case:
The fire consumed everything in its way.
I can't think of any case where you can freely substitute one for the other without changing the meaning.
(Edit) In the case where you're talking about a conscious entity acting as a destructive force (such as an army), which you use depends on what you want to say. For example, if you want to imply the army was engaged in wanton destruction then, as with fire, "in the way" makes more sense.
During the march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way.
On the other hand, if you want to imply the army was consciously selecting targets for destruction, then "on the way" would work:
During the march south, the Union army deliberately torched railways, supply caches, farms, factories, and anything else on the way that might be of strategic value to the Confederates.
If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?
– repomonster
12 hours ago
1
@repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."
– Andrew
12 hours ago
1
@repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"
– Andrew
12 hours ago
2
It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.
– David Schwartz
12 hours ago
This could make sense within context of a longer sentence or paragraph: "They had hoped some crops would survive as the inferno progressed from the barn to the farmhouse, but the fire consumed everything on its way" - however, the important qualifier here is that we know the destination, even if it is not explicitly stated a second time: "the fire consumed everything on its way [from the barn to the farmhouse]"
– Chronocidal
2 hours ago
add a comment |
They are not equivalent. "On the way" means that the location or object is along, adjacent to, or near some route.
If we're going to John's house, can we stop by the store to pick up some snacks? It's on the way.
"In the way" means that the location or object is directly in the path or blocking that route.
You used to be able to see the ocean from that hotel, but recently they built a larger hotel that's in the way.
Another way to think about it is that something "on the way" is convenient, while something "in the way" is an obstruction. It's possible to have both in the same sentence:
On the way to Lauren's house out in the country, we were delayed by a herd of cows that were in the way.
Moreover, "on the way" only really makes sense when talking about something related to people, or other entities that have the ability for conscious choice, even if it's only to specify some point of interest.
The restaurant is on the way to our hotel, if you want to stop for a quick bite.
"Fire" would not qualify, as it is mindless. A fire would not stop at a corner store to pick up a bag of chips (a.k.a. crisps) on its way to burn a town. Instead it might burn down the store, if it was in the way, which is what you should use in this case:
The fire consumed everything in its way.
I can't think of any case where you can freely substitute one for the other without changing the meaning.
(Edit) In the case where you're talking about a conscious entity acting as a destructive force (such as an army), which you use depends on what you want to say. For example, if you want to imply the army was engaged in wanton destruction then, as with fire, "in the way" makes more sense.
During the march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way.
On the other hand, if you want to imply the army was consciously selecting targets for destruction, then "on the way" would work:
During the march south, the Union army deliberately torched railways, supply caches, farms, factories, and anything else on the way that might be of strategic value to the Confederates.
They are not equivalent. "On the way" means that the location or object is along, adjacent to, or near some route.
If we're going to John's house, can we stop by the store to pick up some snacks? It's on the way.
"In the way" means that the location or object is directly in the path or blocking that route.
You used to be able to see the ocean from that hotel, but recently they built a larger hotel that's in the way.
Another way to think about it is that something "on the way" is convenient, while something "in the way" is an obstruction. It's possible to have both in the same sentence:
On the way to Lauren's house out in the country, we were delayed by a herd of cows that were in the way.
Moreover, "on the way" only really makes sense when talking about something related to people, or other entities that have the ability for conscious choice, even if it's only to specify some point of interest.
The restaurant is on the way to our hotel, if you want to stop for a quick bite.
"Fire" would not qualify, as it is mindless. A fire would not stop at a corner store to pick up a bag of chips (a.k.a. crisps) on its way to burn a town. Instead it might burn down the store, if it was in the way, which is what you should use in this case:
The fire consumed everything in its way.
I can't think of any case where you can freely substitute one for the other without changing the meaning.
(Edit) In the case where you're talking about a conscious entity acting as a destructive force (such as an army), which you use depends on what you want to say. For example, if you want to imply the army was engaged in wanton destruction then, as with fire, "in the way" makes more sense.
During the march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way.
On the other hand, if you want to imply the army was consciously selecting targets for destruction, then "on the way" would work:
During the march south, the Union army deliberately torched railways, supply caches, farms, factories, and anything else on the way that might be of strategic value to the Confederates.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 12 hours ago
AndrewAndrew
68.8k678153
68.8k678153
If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?
– repomonster
12 hours ago
1
@repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."
– Andrew
12 hours ago
1
@repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"
– Andrew
12 hours ago
2
It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.
– David Schwartz
12 hours ago
This could make sense within context of a longer sentence or paragraph: "They had hoped some crops would survive as the inferno progressed from the barn to the farmhouse, but the fire consumed everything on its way" - however, the important qualifier here is that we know the destination, even if it is not explicitly stated a second time: "the fire consumed everything on its way [from the barn to the farmhouse]"
– Chronocidal
2 hours ago
add a comment |
If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?
– repomonster
12 hours ago
1
@repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."
– Andrew
12 hours ago
1
@repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"
– Andrew
12 hours ago
2
It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.
– David Schwartz
12 hours ago
This could make sense within context of a longer sentence or paragraph: "They had hoped some crops would survive as the inferno progressed from the barn to the farmhouse, but the fire consumed everything on its way" - however, the important qualifier here is that we know the destination, even if it is not explicitly stated a second time: "the fire consumed everything on its way [from the barn to the farmhouse]"
– Chronocidal
2 hours ago
If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?
– repomonster
12 hours ago
If fire would be used as a metaphor for army it would then make sense?
– repomonster
12 hours ago
1
1
@repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."
– Andrew
12 hours ago
@repomonster It depends on the context. If you're talking about wanton destruction then you'll want to associate the army with any other destructive force, and in the way makes more sense. "On its march south, the Union army indiscriminately torched any towns that were in the way."
– Andrew
12 hours ago
1
1
@repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"
– Andrew
12 hours ago
@repomonster If you use "on the way" it makes it sound like the army is making side trips to consciously choose its targets, "On its way south, the Union army took care to burn down any railway depots, supply caches, and anything else that might be of strategic value"
– Andrew
12 hours ago
2
2
It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.
– David Schwartz
12 hours ago
It's hard to think of examples where they mean the same thing. Being "on the way" (easy to get to from the path) and "in the way" (blocking the path) don't have even remotely similar meanings. They even have opposite implications with "on the way" implying convenience and "in the way" implying inconvenience.
– David Schwartz
12 hours ago
This could make sense within context of a longer sentence or paragraph: "They had hoped some crops would survive as the inferno progressed from the barn to the farmhouse, but the fire consumed everything on its way" - however, the important qualifier here is that we know the destination, even if it is not explicitly stated a second time: "the fire consumed everything on its way [from the barn to the farmhouse]"
– Chronocidal
2 hours ago
This could make sense within context of a longer sentence or paragraph: "They had hoped some crops would survive as the inferno progressed from the barn to the farmhouse, but the fire consumed everything on its way" - however, the important qualifier here is that we know the destination, even if it is not explicitly stated a second time: "the fire consumed everything on its way [from the barn to the farmhouse]"
– Chronocidal
2 hours ago
add a comment |
They can mean similar things in many cases, but they are definitely not always the same. For instance, 'in' can mean 'inside [of]' while 'on' can mean 'on top [of]'. There are too many use cases to explain. You pretty much have to know them all in a case by case sort of way.
In your example, they mean different things, but the effect could be similar.
'The fire consumed everything in its way' means that the fire burned everything that was blocking its path.
On the other hand, 'The fire consumed everything on its way' literally could mean 'everything' (rather than just everything in its path). However, people would probably understand your intent.
Doing something on the way doesn't have to mean that the direct object is nearby: e.g. 'I called my friend on my way to the dentist.' Your friend could be in another country.
A fire could destroy things far away on its way, too. For instance, the destruction of a bomb factory in its path could blow up the whole town on its way. I think it would be reasonable to say the fire destroyed the town, but people could argue that. Or a fire might cause a beam to fall that triggers a switch that makes a rocket launch that causes who knows what else to happen. Anything the fire could do during its journey could be done on its way.
However, when it comes to humans, there is sometimes a context that implies convenience, as Andrew mentioned (but that context doesn't always exist). For instance, "Since you're already going to Chicago, will you pick up some stuff for me on the way?" That's about convenience, while, "I called my mother on the way" isn't necessarily.
It's pretty common for 'in' and 'on' to mean different things.
I feel like the fire would only be consuming things on its way if it had an apparent destination. "The fire went straight for the gas company, and consumed everything on its way." Other than this nit, I prefer your answer, because it feels like it speaks more directly to the OP's example.
– Ed Grimm
11 hours ago
add a comment |
They can mean similar things in many cases, but they are definitely not always the same. For instance, 'in' can mean 'inside [of]' while 'on' can mean 'on top [of]'. There are too many use cases to explain. You pretty much have to know them all in a case by case sort of way.
In your example, they mean different things, but the effect could be similar.
'The fire consumed everything in its way' means that the fire burned everything that was blocking its path.
On the other hand, 'The fire consumed everything on its way' literally could mean 'everything' (rather than just everything in its path). However, people would probably understand your intent.
Doing something on the way doesn't have to mean that the direct object is nearby: e.g. 'I called my friend on my way to the dentist.' Your friend could be in another country.
A fire could destroy things far away on its way, too. For instance, the destruction of a bomb factory in its path could blow up the whole town on its way. I think it would be reasonable to say the fire destroyed the town, but people could argue that. Or a fire might cause a beam to fall that triggers a switch that makes a rocket launch that causes who knows what else to happen. Anything the fire could do during its journey could be done on its way.
However, when it comes to humans, there is sometimes a context that implies convenience, as Andrew mentioned (but that context doesn't always exist). For instance, "Since you're already going to Chicago, will you pick up some stuff for me on the way?" That's about convenience, while, "I called my mother on the way" isn't necessarily.
It's pretty common for 'in' and 'on' to mean different things.
I feel like the fire would only be consuming things on its way if it had an apparent destination. "The fire went straight for the gas company, and consumed everything on its way." Other than this nit, I prefer your answer, because it feels like it speaks more directly to the OP's example.
– Ed Grimm
11 hours ago
add a comment |
They can mean similar things in many cases, but they are definitely not always the same. For instance, 'in' can mean 'inside [of]' while 'on' can mean 'on top [of]'. There are too many use cases to explain. You pretty much have to know them all in a case by case sort of way.
In your example, they mean different things, but the effect could be similar.
'The fire consumed everything in its way' means that the fire burned everything that was blocking its path.
On the other hand, 'The fire consumed everything on its way' literally could mean 'everything' (rather than just everything in its path). However, people would probably understand your intent.
Doing something on the way doesn't have to mean that the direct object is nearby: e.g. 'I called my friend on my way to the dentist.' Your friend could be in another country.
A fire could destroy things far away on its way, too. For instance, the destruction of a bomb factory in its path could blow up the whole town on its way. I think it would be reasonable to say the fire destroyed the town, but people could argue that. Or a fire might cause a beam to fall that triggers a switch that makes a rocket launch that causes who knows what else to happen. Anything the fire could do during its journey could be done on its way.
However, when it comes to humans, there is sometimes a context that implies convenience, as Andrew mentioned (but that context doesn't always exist). For instance, "Since you're already going to Chicago, will you pick up some stuff for me on the way?" That's about convenience, while, "I called my mother on the way" isn't necessarily.
It's pretty common for 'in' and 'on' to mean different things.
They can mean similar things in many cases, but they are definitely not always the same. For instance, 'in' can mean 'inside [of]' while 'on' can mean 'on top [of]'. There are too many use cases to explain. You pretty much have to know them all in a case by case sort of way.
In your example, they mean different things, but the effect could be similar.
'The fire consumed everything in its way' means that the fire burned everything that was blocking its path.
On the other hand, 'The fire consumed everything on its way' literally could mean 'everything' (rather than just everything in its path). However, people would probably understand your intent.
Doing something on the way doesn't have to mean that the direct object is nearby: e.g. 'I called my friend on my way to the dentist.' Your friend could be in another country.
A fire could destroy things far away on its way, too. For instance, the destruction of a bomb factory in its path could blow up the whole town on its way. I think it would be reasonable to say the fire destroyed the town, but people could argue that. Or a fire might cause a beam to fall that triggers a switch that makes a rocket launch that causes who knows what else to happen. Anything the fire could do during its journey could be done on its way.
However, when it comes to humans, there is sometimes a context that implies convenience, as Andrew mentioned (but that context doesn't always exist). For instance, "Since you're already going to Chicago, will you pick up some stuff for me on the way?" That's about convenience, while, "I called my mother on the way" isn't necessarily.
It's pretty common for 'in' and 'on' to mean different things.
edited 10 hours ago
answered 12 hours ago
ShuleShule
23017
23017
I feel like the fire would only be consuming things on its way if it had an apparent destination. "The fire went straight for the gas company, and consumed everything on its way." Other than this nit, I prefer your answer, because it feels like it speaks more directly to the OP's example.
– Ed Grimm
11 hours ago
add a comment |
I feel like the fire would only be consuming things on its way if it had an apparent destination. "The fire went straight for the gas company, and consumed everything on its way." Other than this nit, I prefer your answer, because it feels like it speaks more directly to the OP's example.
– Ed Grimm
11 hours ago
I feel like the fire would only be consuming things on its way if it had an apparent destination. "The fire went straight for the gas company, and consumed everything on its way." Other than this nit, I prefer your answer, because it feels like it speaks more directly to the OP's example.
– Ed Grimm
11 hours ago
I feel like the fire would only be consuming things on its way if it had an apparent destination. "The fire went straight for the gas company, and consumed everything on its way." Other than this nit, I prefer your answer, because it feels like it speaks more directly to the OP's example.
– Ed Grimm
11 hours ago
add a comment |
They are not identical in meaning, but the outcome MAY be the same.
"on it's way" relates to objects in close proximity to the path that it follows.
Here
- "way" is essentially a reference to a physical route, although most would not intuitively see it as meaning this.
- "on" means "in immediate proximity to", besides.
"in it's way" refers to items BLOCKING it's path or lying ON (rather than next to) the path it took so that the fire passed across or through them.
Here
- "way" is again a reference to the physical path taken.
- "in" means blocking, occupying, lying across.
add a comment |
They are not identical in meaning, but the outcome MAY be the same.
"on it's way" relates to objects in close proximity to the path that it follows.
Here
- "way" is essentially a reference to a physical route, although most would not intuitively see it as meaning this.
- "on" means "in immediate proximity to", besides.
"in it's way" refers to items BLOCKING it's path or lying ON (rather than next to) the path it took so that the fire passed across or through them.
Here
- "way" is again a reference to the physical path taken.
- "in" means blocking, occupying, lying across.
add a comment |
They are not identical in meaning, but the outcome MAY be the same.
"on it's way" relates to objects in close proximity to the path that it follows.
Here
- "way" is essentially a reference to a physical route, although most would not intuitively see it as meaning this.
- "on" means "in immediate proximity to", besides.
"in it's way" refers to items BLOCKING it's path or lying ON (rather than next to) the path it took so that the fire passed across or through them.
Here
- "way" is again a reference to the physical path taken.
- "in" means blocking, occupying, lying across.
They are not identical in meaning, but the outcome MAY be the same.
"on it's way" relates to objects in close proximity to the path that it follows.
Here
- "way" is essentially a reference to a physical route, although most would not intuitively see it as meaning this.
- "on" means "in immediate proximity to", besides.
"in it's way" refers to items BLOCKING it's path or lying ON (rather than next to) the path it took so that the fire passed across or through them.
Here
- "way" is again a reference to the physical path taken.
- "in" means blocking, occupying, lying across.
answered 1 hour ago
Russell McMahonRussell McMahon
31415
31415
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198374%2fon-its-way-vs-in-its-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Replace "on its way" with "in its path" to say what you intended it to mean.
– Erin
11 hours ago
I don't know how to cite an idiomatic-language question's answer. All I can say is, it isn't incorrect, but I'd use "along its path" because that's what I've heard before.
– Mazura
9 hours ago
@Mazura: For example, a native speaker of American English can cite themselves: "To my (American) ear, ________ sounds natural."
– Jasper
8 hours ago
"on it's way" relates to objects in close proximity to the path that it follows. Here "way" is essentially a reference to a physical route, although most would not intuitively see it as meaning this. "in it's way" refers to items BLOCKING it's path or lyong ON the path it took so that the fire passed across or through them.
– Russell McMahon
1 hour ago
1
I'm not sure why you would think "on its way" and "in its way" mean "pretty much the same thing". You can see an apple tree on your way even if you don't see an apple tree in your way...
– user21820
47 mins ago