Why is “Reports” in the sentence below without the article “The”? The 2019 Stack...
Why did Howard Stark use all the Vibranium they had on a prototype shield?
How to reverse every other sublist of a list?
Carnot-Caratheodory metric
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?
Geography at the pixel level
Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?
Why is my p-value correlated to difference between means in two sample tests?
What are my rights when I have a Sparpreis ticket but can't board an overcrowded train?
Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
Is it possible for the two major parties in the UK to form a coalition with each other instead of a much smaller party?
The difference between dialogue marks
Inline version of a function returns different value than non-inline version
Understanding the implication of what "well-defined" means for the operation in quotient group
I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?
"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"
Why is it "Tumoren" and not "Tumore"?
Pristine Bit Checking
"What time...?" or "At what time...?" - what is more grammatically correct?
What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?
What tool would a Roman-age civilization have to grind silver and other metals into dust?
Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?
Why is “Reports” in the sentence below without the article “The”?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhy is “sensor fusion” without “the”?Why does the sentence have the indefinite article?Why isn’t there an article?as separator — why no article?What is onion? Asking without an articlepreposition + Noun without article“Mechanism of toxicity involves…” - why without the definite article?With or without the indefinite article (an)?The definite article before names of professions without earlier referencestart with 'the' or start without article
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
Why is "Reports" in sentence below without "The"?
Reports are coming in that a train has crashed near Birmingham.
This sentence is copied from the book How English Works by Michael Swam and Catherine Walter.
Why my question? Because I think that the plural "Reports" is a group of reports that have something together. It is new about "a train has crashed near Birmingham". For example, "The apples are red." Why not "Apples are red". I think because it is a group of red apples, not mix red, green, blue, etc.
articles american-english
add a comment |
Why is "Reports" in sentence below without "The"?
Reports are coming in that a train has crashed near Birmingham.
This sentence is copied from the book How English Works by Michael Swam and Catherine Walter.
Why my question? Because I think that the plural "Reports" is a group of reports that have something together. It is new about "a train has crashed near Birmingham". For example, "The apples are red." Why not "Apples are red". I think because it is a group of red apples, not mix red, green, blue, etc.
articles american-english
add a comment |
Why is "Reports" in sentence below without "The"?
Reports are coming in that a train has crashed near Birmingham.
This sentence is copied from the book How English Works by Michael Swam and Catherine Walter.
Why my question? Because I think that the plural "Reports" is a group of reports that have something together. It is new about "a train has crashed near Birmingham". For example, "The apples are red." Why not "Apples are red". I think because it is a group of red apples, not mix red, green, blue, etc.
articles american-english
Why is "Reports" in sentence below without "The"?
Reports are coming in that a train has crashed near Birmingham.
This sentence is copied from the book How English Works by Michael Swam and Catherine Walter.
Why my question? Because I think that the plural "Reports" is a group of reports that have something together. It is new about "a train has crashed near Birmingham". For example, "The apples are red." Why not "Apples are red". I think because it is a group of red apples, not mix red, green, blue, etc.
articles american-english
articles american-english
edited yesterday
muru
36929
36929
asked 2 days ago
b2okb2ok
361315
361315
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Plurals do not require articles. If you use an article, you have a different meaning.
There are apples in the bowl. The apples are red.
The previously identified apples are red. Just like when used with a singular, the use of the definite article, the, indicates that you are talking about specific apples.
Apples are red.
This is a claim that apples, in general, are red. This is clearly an incorrect statement, as some apples have no noticeable red pigmentation at all. They are green (or, sometimes, more like yellow).
Apples are falling on my house.
Now, this isn't a general statement. It's not claiming that all apples in the world are falling your house right now. That would be alarming. It is saying that there are apples falling on your house. Similarly, we might say:
Reports are coming in that StackExchange is going to shut down.
This says that some reports are coming in saying that. If there was just one such report, we'd say "a report is coming in...". If we don't want to be precise about numbers, we just say reports.
I haven't sat down and explored this thoroughly, but it seems to me that a plural without article as the subject of a linking verb (be, look, seem, feel) is a statement in general about that category of item, possibly limited by context, and I suspect the same is true of verbs of state (stative verbs) and generally of verbs of perception (though I don't imagine inanimate objects being subjects of those very often). I'm not sure if there's a general rule for other action verbs, though. That's probably dependent on context. And of course negation changes things. For example,
Trains aren't running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's a general statement. However,
Trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's not; not all trains are running on the West Coast Mainline, after all. However, this might be because the first could be rewritten:
No trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
Then there's an explicit determiner.
Essentially, you can consider most plural nouns as having a determiner - either explicit, or implicit. It's working out what the implicit determiner is that's the trick. In your example, it's clearly some. In others, it will be something else.
add a comment |
Not a native speaker. That being disclaimed, I would say that the reports in this context are general and not specifically known from previous situation. If it'd be only a single report, you'd say "a report is coming..." but since it's multiple instances of it, we can omit the.
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
2 days ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
2 days ago
2
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
1
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
2 days ago
@b2ok That's incorrect. If yo say "the apples are red", then I'm assuming that it's a specific subset of apples and not apples in general. If you say "apples are red" I can contradict you by presenting a green apple. In the former case, though, I can't. I may ask "which appples do you refer to", though.
– Konrad Viltersten
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
The important thing here is to differentiate between definite and indefinite. That there's no article in your example sentence shows that "reports" is indefinite. Indefinite plural nouns have no article. It's indefinite because the reader doesn't already know which reports are being referred to. In subsequent sentences, we might expect to see "the reports..." but since this is the first sentence about the topic, the reader has no prior knowledge of the reports.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204351%2fwhy-is-reports-in-the-sentence-below-without-the-article-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Plurals do not require articles. If you use an article, you have a different meaning.
There are apples in the bowl. The apples are red.
The previously identified apples are red. Just like when used with a singular, the use of the definite article, the, indicates that you are talking about specific apples.
Apples are red.
This is a claim that apples, in general, are red. This is clearly an incorrect statement, as some apples have no noticeable red pigmentation at all. They are green (or, sometimes, more like yellow).
Apples are falling on my house.
Now, this isn't a general statement. It's not claiming that all apples in the world are falling your house right now. That would be alarming. It is saying that there are apples falling on your house. Similarly, we might say:
Reports are coming in that StackExchange is going to shut down.
This says that some reports are coming in saying that. If there was just one such report, we'd say "a report is coming in...". If we don't want to be precise about numbers, we just say reports.
I haven't sat down and explored this thoroughly, but it seems to me that a plural without article as the subject of a linking verb (be, look, seem, feel) is a statement in general about that category of item, possibly limited by context, and I suspect the same is true of verbs of state (stative verbs) and generally of verbs of perception (though I don't imagine inanimate objects being subjects of those very often). I'm not sure if there's a general rule for other action verbs, though. That's probably dependent on context. And of course negation changes things. For example,
Trains aren't running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's a general statement. However,
Trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's not; not all trains are running on the West Coast Mainline, after all. However, this might be because the first could be rewritten:
No trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
Then there's an explicit determiner.
Essentially, you can consider most plural nouns as having a determiner - either explicit, or implicit. It's working out what the implicit determiner is that's the trick. In your example, it's clearly some. In others, it will be something else.
add a comment |
Plurals do not require articles. If you use an article, you have a different meaning.
There are apples in the bowl. The apples are red.
The previously identified apples are red. Just like when used with a singular, the use of the definite article, the, indicates that you are talking about specific apples.
Apples are red.
This is a claim that apples, in general, are red. This is clearly an incorrect statement, as some apples have no noticeable red pigmentation at all. They are green (or, sometimes, more like yellow).
Apples are falling on my house.
Now, this isn't a general statement. It's not claiming that all apples in the world are falling your house right now. That would be alarming. It is saying that there are apples falling on your house. Similarly, we might say:
Reports are coming in that StackExchange is going to shut down.
This says that some reports are coming in saying that. If there was just one such report, we'd say "a report is coming in...". If we don't want to be precise about numbers, we just say reports.
I haven't sat down and explored this thoroughly, but it seems to me that a plural without article as the subject of a linking verb (be, look, seem, feel) is a statement in general about that category of item, possibly limited by context, and I suspect the same is true of verbs of state (stative verbs) and generally of verbs of perception (though I don't imagine inanimate objects being subjects of those very often). I'm not sure if there's a general rule for other action verbs, though. That's probably dependent on context. And of course negation changes things. For example,
Trains aren't running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's a general statement. However,
Trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's not; not all trains are running on the West Coast Mainline, after all. However, this might be because the first could be rewritten:
No trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
Then there's an explicit determiner.
Essentially, you can consider most plural nouns as having a determiner - either explicit, or implicit. It's working out what the implicit determiner is that's the trick. In your example, it's clearly some. In others, it will be something else.
add a comment |
Plurals do not require articles. If you use an article, you have a different meaning.
There are apples in the bowl. The apples are red.
The previously identified apples are red. Just like when used with a singular, the use of the definite article, the, indicates that you are talking about specific apples.
Apples are red.
This is a claim that apples, in general, are red. This is clearly an incorrect statement, as some apples have no noticeable red pigmentation at all. They are green (or, sometimes, more like yellow).
Apples are falling on my house.
Now, this isn't a general statement. It's not claiming that all apples in the world are falling your house right now. That would be alarming. It is saying that there are apples falling on your house. Similarly, we might say:
Reports are coming in that StackExchange is going to shut down.
This says that some reports are coming in saying that. If there was just one such report, we'd say "a report is coming in...". If we don't want to be precise about numbers, we just say reports.
I haven't sat down and explored this thoroughly, but it seems to me that a plural without article as the subject of a linking verb (be, look, seem, feel) is a statement in general about that category of item, possibly limited by context, and I suspect the same is true of verbs of state (stative verbs) and generally of verbs of perception (though I don't imagine inanimate objects being subjects of those very often). I'm not sure if there's a general rule for other action verbs, though. That's probably dependent on context. And of course negation changes things. For example,
Trains aren't running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's a general statement. However,
Trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's not; not all trains are running on the West Coast Mainline, after all. However, this might be because the first could be rewritten:
No trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
Then there's an explicit determiner.
Essentially, you can consider most plural nouns as having a determiner - either explicit, or implicit. It's working out what the implicit determiner is that's the trick. In your example, it's clearly some. In others, it will be something else.
Plurals do not require articles. If you use an article, you have a different meaning.
There are apples in the bowl. The apples are red.
The previously identified apples are red. Just like when used with a singular, the use of the definite article, the, indicates that you are talking about specific apples.
Apples are red.
This is a claim that apples, in general, are red. This is clearly an incorrect statement, as some apples have no noticeable red pigmentation at all. They are green (or, sometimes, more like yellow).
Apples are falling on my house.
Now, this isn't a general statement. It's not claiming that all apples in the world are falling your house right now. That would be alarming. It is saying that there are apples falling on your house. Similarly, we might say:
Reports are coming in that StackExchange is going to shut down.
This says that some reports are coming in saying that. If there was just one such report, we'd say "a report is coming in...". If we don't want to be precise about numbers, we just say reports.
I haven't sat down and explored this thoroughly, but it seems to me that a plural without article as the subject of a linking verb (be, look, seem, feel) is a statement in general about that category of item, possibly limited by context, and I suspect the same is true of verbs of state (stative verbs) and generally of verbs of perception (though I don't imagine inanimate objects being subjects of those very often). I'm not sure if there's a general rule for other action verbs, though. That's probably dependent on context. And of course negation changes things. For example,
Trains aren't running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's a general statement. However,
Trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
That's not; not all trains are running on the West Coast Mainline, after all. However, this might be because the first could be rewritten:
No trains are running on the West Coast Mainline today.
Then there's an explicit determiner.
Essentially, you can consider most plural nouns as having a determiner - either explicit, or implicit. It's working out what the implicit determiner is that's the trick. In your example, it's clearly some. In others, it will be something else.
answered 2 days ago
SamBCSamBC
18.3k2567
18.3k2567
add a comment |
add a comment |
Not a native speaker. That being disclaimed, I would say that the reports in this context are general and not specifically known from previous situation. If it'd be only a single report, you'd say "a report is coming..." but since it's multiple instances of it, we can omit the.
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
2 days ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
2 days ago
2
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
1
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
2 days ago
@b2ok That's incorrect. If yo say "the apples are red", then I'm assuming that it's a specific subset of apples and not apples in general. If you say "apples are red" I can contradict you by presenting a green apple. In the former case, though, I can't. I may ask "which appples do you refer to", though.
– Konrad Viltersten
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
Not a native speaker. That being disclaimed, I would say that the reports in this context are general and not specifically known from previous situation. If it'd be only a single report, you'd say "a report is coming..." but since it's multiple instances of it, we can omit the.
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
2 days ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
2 days ago
2
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
1
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
2 days ago
@b2ok That's incorrect. If yo say "the apples are red", then I'm assuming that it's a specific subset of apples and not apples in general. If you say "apples are red" I can contradict you by presenting a green apple. In the former case, though, I can't. I may ask "which appples do you refer to", though.
– Konrad Viltersten
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
Not a native speaker. That being disclaimed, I would say that the reports in this context are general and not specifically known from previous situation. If it'd be only a single report, you'd say "a report is coming..." but since it's multiple instances of it, we can omit the.
Not a native speaker. That being disclaimed, I would say that the reports in this context are general and not specifically known from previous situation. If it'd be only a single report, you'd say "a report is coming..." but since it's multiple instances of it, we can omit the.
answered 2 days ago
Konrad VilterstenKonrad Viltersten
2,09722344
2,09722344
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
2 days ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
2 days ago
2
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
1
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
2 days ago
@b2ok That's incorrect. If yo say "the apples are red", then I'm assuming that it's a specific subset of apples and not apples in general. If you say "apples are red" I can contradict you by presenting a green apple. In the former case, though, I can't. I may ask "which appples do you refer to", though.
– Konrad Viltersten
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
2 days ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
2 days ago
2
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
1
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
2 days ago
@b2ok That's incorrect. If yo say "the apples are red", then I'm assuming that it's a specific subset of apples and not apples in general. If you say "apples are red" I can contradict you by presenting a green apple. In the former case, though, I can't. I may ask "which appples do you refer to", though.
– Konrad Viltersten
yesterday
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
2 days ago
"The apples are red" also "not specifically known from the previous situation"
– b2ok
2 days ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
2 days ago
"Reports are coming in ..." means continuous = they are known from the previous situation
– b2ok
2 days ago
2
2
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
@b2ok Nor would anybody say the apples are red if their existence hadn't been previously established, and some specific apples identified. If all apples, in general, are red, there would be no article at all. (And you can't say that there is a "previous situation" about the reports if you've failed to give that context.)
– Jason Bassford
2 days ago
1
1
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
2 days ago
@b2ok I don't follow the logic of either of your comments. Are you sure you don't have them backwards?
– Dawood ibn Kareem
2 days ago
@b2ok That's incorrect. If yo say "the apples are red", then I'm assuming that it's a specific subset of apples and not apples in general. If you say "apples are red" I can contradict you by presenting a green apple. In the former case, though, I can't. I may ask "which appples do you refer to", though.
– Konrad Viltersten
yesterday
@b2ok That's incorrect. If yo say "the apples are red", then I'm assuming that it's a specific subset of apples and not apples in general. If you say "apples are red" I can contradict you by presenting a green apple. In the former case, though, I can't. I may ask "which appples do you refer to", though.
– Konrad Viltersten
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
The important thing here is to differentiate between definite and indefinite. That there's no article in your example sentence shows that "reports" is indefinite. Indefinite plural nouns have no article. It's indefinite because the reader doesn't already know which reports are being referred to. In subsequent sentences, we might expect to see "the reports..." but since this is the first sentence about the topic, the reader has no prior knowledge of the reports.
add a comment |
The important thing here is to differentiate between definite and indefinite. That there's no article in your example sentence shows that "reports" is indefinite. Indefinite plural nouns have no article. It's indefinite because the reader doesn't already know which reports are being referred to. In subsequent sentences, we might expect to see "the reports..." but since this is the first sentence about the topic, the reader has no prior knowledge of the reports.
add a comment |
The important thing here is to differentiate between definite and indefinite. That there's no article in your example sentence shows that "reports" is indefinite. Indefinite plural nouns have no article. It's indefinite because the reader doesn't already know which reports are being referred to. In subsequent sentences, we might expect to see "the reports..." but since this is the first sentence about the topic, the reader has no prior knowledge of the reports.
The important thing here is to differentiate between definite and indefinite. That there's no article in your example sentence shows that "reports" is indefinite. Indefinite plural nouns have no article. It's indefinite because the reader doesn't already know which reports are being referred to. In subsequent sentences, we might expect to see "the reports..." but since this is the first sentence about the topic, the reader has no prior knowledge of the reports.
answered 2 days ago
Scott SeveranceScott Severance
753715
753715
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204351%2fwhy-is-reports-in-the-sentence-below-without-the-article-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown