Understanding this description of teleportation Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18,...
What is the longest distance a 13th-level monk can jump while attacking on the same turn?
Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?
ListPlot join points by nearest neighbor rather than order
Gastric acid as a weapon
Is the argument below valid?
Is there a "higher Segal conjecture"?
What is the musical term for a note that continously plays through a melody?
Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters
How can I fade player character when he goes inside or outside of the area?
Is the address of a local variable a constexpr?
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
Why is "Consequences inflicted." not a sentence?
When to stop saving and start investing?
How to do this path/lattice with tikz
"Seemed to had" is it correct?
If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?
How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?
What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?
When -s is used with third person singular. What's its use in this context?
Is a manifold-with-boundary with given interior and non-empty boundary essentially unique?
Letter Boxed validator
What is the correct way to use the pinch test for dehydration?
Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?
How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?
Understanding this description of teleportation
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations (HHL09): Step 1 - Confusion regarding the usage of phase estimation algorithmQuantum algorithm for linear systems of equations (HHL09): Step 2 - What is $|Psi_0rangle$?HHL algorithm — problem with the outcome of postselectionQutrit TeleportationGeneral construction of $W_n$-stateCalculating measurement result of quantum swap circuitQuantum teleportation: second classical bit for removing entanglement?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrt{N}$?Quantum teleportation with moving Alice and BobHow to complete this teleportation circuit? How to create a copy of $|psi〉$?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
In the context of quantum teleportation, my lecturer writes the following (note that I assume the reader is familiar with the circuit):
If the measurement of the first qubit is 0 and the measurement of the second qubit is 0 , then we have the state $left|phi_4right>=c_0left|000right>+c_1left|001right>=left|00right>otimes left(c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>right)=left|00right> otimes left|psi 'right>$.
Now to get the final teleported state we have to go through the final two gates $Z, X$.
My lecturer writes this as;
$left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left|psi 'right>= left|psi'right>= c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>$
Here are my questions:
Why is it that the we do not have $left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left(left|00right>otimes left|psi 'right>right)$? I don't understand why we cut the state $left|phi_4right>$ "in half ", to use bad terminology, at this step.
What does the superscript 0 on the operators refer to?
In the final state again to use bad terminology we only use half of the state $left|phi_4right>$ can we always assume that the final state will be the $left|psi'right>$ part of $left|phi_4right>=left|xyright>otimesleft|psi'right>$ state, and if so what is the significance of the final step.
If my question is unanswerable due to a deep misunderstanding of the math processes here, I'd still really appreciate some clarification on whatever points can be answered and I can edit it to make more sense as I learn.
algorithm quantum-state quantum-information teleportation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the context of quantum teleportation, my lecturer writes the following (note that I assume the reader is familiar with the circuit):
If the measurement of the first qubit is 0 and the measurement of the second qubit is 0 , then we have the state $left|phi_4right>=c_0left|000right>+c_1left|001right>=left|00right>otimes left(c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>right)=left|00right> otimes left|psi 'right>$.
Now to get the final teleported state we have to go through the final two gates $Z, X$.
My lecturer writes this as;
$left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left|psi 'right>= left|psi'right>= c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>$
Here are my questions:
Why is it that the we do not have $left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left(left|00right>otimes left|psi 'right>right)$? I don't understand why we cut the state $left|phi_4right>$ "in half ", to use bad terminology, at this step.
What does the superscript 0 on the operators refer to?
In the final state again to use bad terminology we only use half of the state $left|phi_4right>$ can we always assume that the final state will be the $left|psi'right>$ part of $left|phi_4right>=left|xyright>otimesleft|psi'right>$ state, and if so what is the significance of the final step.
If my question is unanswerable due to a deep misunderstanding of the math processes here, I'd still really appreciate some clarification on whatever points can be answered and I can edit it to make more sense as I learn.
algorithm quantum-state quantum-information teleportation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the context of quantum teleportation, my lecturer writes the following (note that I assume the reader is familiar with the circuit):
If the measurement of the first qubit is 0 and the measurement of the second qubit is 0 , then we have the state $left|phi_4right>=c_0left|000right>+c_1left|001right>=left|00right>otimes left(c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>right)=left|00right> otimes left|psi 'right>$.
Now to get the final teleported state we have to go through the final two gates $Z, X$.
My lecturer writes this as;
$left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left|psi 'right>= left|psi'right>= c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>$
Here are my questions:
Why is it that the we do not have $left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left(left|00right>otimes left|psi 'right>right)$? I don't understand why we cut the state $left|phi_4right>$ "in half ", to use bad terminology, at this step.
What does the superscript 0 on the operators refer to?
In the final state again to use bad terminology we only use half of the state $left|phi_4right>$ can we always assume that the final state will be the $left|psi'right>$ part of $left|phi_4right>=left|xyright>otimesleft|psi'right>$ state, and if so what is the significance of the final step.
If my question is unanswerable due to a deep misunderstanding of the math processes here, I'd still really appreciate some clarification on whatever points can be answered and I can edit it to make more sense as I learn.
algorithm quantum-state quantum-information teleportation
New contributor
$endgroup$
In the context of quantum teleportation, my lecturer writes the following (note that I assume the reader is familiar with the circuit):
If the measurement of the first qubit is 0 and the measurement of the second qubit is 0 , then we have the state $left|phi_4right>=c_0left|000right>+c_1left|001right>=left|00right>otimes left(c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>right)=left|00right> otimes left|psi 'right>$.
Now to get the final teleported state we have to go through the final two gates $Z, X$.
My lecturer writes this as;
$left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left|psi 'right>= left|psi'right>= c_0left|0right>+c_1left|1right>$
Here are my questions:
Why is it that the we do not have $left|gammaright>=Z^0X^0left(left|00right>otimes left|psi 'right>right)$? I don't understand why we cut the state $left|phi_4right>$ "in half ", to use bad terminology, at this step.
What does the superscript 0 on the operators refer to?
In the final state again to use bad terminology we only use half of the state $left|phi_4right>$ can we always assume that the final state will be the $left|psi'right>$ part of $left|phi_4right>=left|xyright>otimesleft|psi'right>$ state, and if so what is the significance of the final step.
If my question is unanswerable due to a deep misunderstanding of the math processes here, I'd still really appreciate some clarification on whatever points can be answered and I can edit it to make more sense as I learn.
algorithm quantum-state quantum-information teleportation
algorithm quantum-state quantum-information teleportation
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
Sanchayan Dutta♦
6,68641556
6,68641556
New contributor
asked yesterday
can'tcauchycan'tcauchy
1385
1385
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The first two qubits stay on the sender's side, and since they are not entangled with the receiver's qubit, it's not necessary to mention them any further — we switched to discussing the receiver's side of the protocol, and all information from the first two qubits is now in measurement results.
The superscripts denote the power of the operator applied: if both measurement results are 0, you don't need to apply X or Z corrections, which is the same as applying these operators raised to power 0 ($X^0 = Z^0 = I$).
After measuring the first two qubits, the state will always be represented as $|xyrangle otimes |text{some state}rangle$, but to convert the receiver's qubit from $|text{some state}rangle$ to the state that needed to be teleported $|psi'rangle$ you'll need to apply corrections which depend on the measurement results $x$ and $y$. I believe this is what you refer to as the final step, and its goal is fixing the amplitudes of the state for it to match the state that was teleported.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use thetext{}
formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover,1.
,2.
and3.
is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE).1)
,2)
and3)
does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "694"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5913%2funderstanding-this-description-of-teleportation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The first two qubits stay on the sender's side, and since they are not entangled with the receiver's qubit, it's not necessary to mention them any further — we switched to discussing the receiver's side of the protocol, and all information from the first two qubits is now in measurement results.
The superscripts denote the power of the operator applied: if both measurement results are 0, you don't need to apply X or Z corrections, which is the same as applying these operators raised to power 0 ($X^0 = Z^0 = I$).
After measuring the first two qubits, the state will always be represented as $|xyrangle otimes |text{some state}rangle$, but to convert the receiver's qubit from $|text{some state}rangle$ to the state that needed to be teleported $|psi'rangle$ you'll need to apply corrections which depend on the measurement results $x$ and $y$. I believe this is what you refer to as the final step, and its goal is fixing the amplitudes of the state for it to match the state that was teleported.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use thetext{}
formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover,1.
,2.
and3.
is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE).1)
,2)
and3)
does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first two qubits stay on the sender's side, and since they are not entangled with the receiver's qubit, it's not necessary to mention them any further — we switched to discussing the receiver's side of the protocol, and all information from the first two qubits is now in measurement results.
The superscripts denote the power of the operator applied: if both measurement results are 0, you don't need to apply X or Z corrections, which is the same as applying these operators raised to power 0 ($X^0 = Z^0 = I$).
After measuring the first two qubits, the state will always be represented as $|xyrangle otimes |text{some state}rangle$, but to convert the receiver's qubit from $|text{some state}rangle$ to the state that needed to be teleported $|psi'rangle$ you'll need to apply corrections which depend on the measurement results $x$ and $y$. I believe this is what you refer to as the final step, and its goal is fixing the amplitudes of the state for it to match the state that was teleported.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use thetext{}
formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover,1.
,2.
and3.
is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE).1)
,2)
and3)
does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first two qubits stay on the sender's side, and since they are not entangled with the receiver's qubit, it's not necessary to mention them any further — we switched to discussing the receiver's side of the protocol, and all information from the first two qubits is now in measurement results.
The superscripts denote the power of the operator applied: if both measurement results are 0, you don't need to apply X or Z corrections, which is the same as applying these operators raised to power 0 ($X^0 = Z^0 = I$).
After measuring the first two qubits, the state will always be represented as $|xyrangle otimes |text{some state}rangle$, but to convert the receiver's qubit from $|text{some state}rangle$ to the state that needed to be teleported $|psi'rangle$ you'll need to apply corrections which depend on the measurement results $x$ and $y$. I believe this is what you refer to as the final step, and its goal is fixing the amplitudes of the state for it to match the state that was teleported.
$endgroup$
The first two qubits stay on the sender's side, and since they are not entangled with the receiver's qubit, it's not necessary to mention them any further — we switched to discussing the receiver's side of the protocol, and all information from the first two qubits is now in measurement results.
The superscripts denote the power of the operator applied: if both measurement results are 0, you don't need to apply X or Z corrections, which is the same as applying these operators raised to power 0 ($X^0 = Z^0 = I$).
After measuring the first two qubits, the state will always be represented as $|xyrangle otimes |text{some state}rangle$, but to convert the receiver's qubit from $|text{some state}rangle$ to the state that needed to be teleported $|psi'rangle$ you'll need to apply corrections which depend on the measurement results $x$ and $y$. I believe this is what you refer to as the final step, and its goal is fixing the amplitudes of the state for it to match the state that was teleported.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Mariia MykhailovaMariia Mykhailova
1,8851212
1,8851212
1
$begingroup$
Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use thetext{}
formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover,1.
,2.
and3.
is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE).1)
,2)
and3)
does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
yesterday
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use thetext{}
formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover,1.
,2.
and3.
is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE).1)
,2)
and3)
does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use the
text{}
formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover, 1.
, 2.
and 3.
is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE). 1)
, 2)
and 3)
does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
yesterday
$begingroup$
Minor nitpicks. If you write text within a mathematical expression it's best to use the
text{}
formatting; otherwise, the $spacing space between space letters space is space somewhat space uneven$. Moreover, 1.
, 2.
and 3.
is the only format that works for numbered lists (on SE). 1)
, 2)
and 3)
does not work. Cf. help/formatting. I've edited these things; hope you don't mind. Also, it might be useful to clarify the Alice-Bob terminology in the answer itself as the OP doesn't seem to be using it.$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
yesterday
add a comment |
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
can'tcauchy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5913%2funderstanding-this-description-of-teleportation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown