If you attempt to grapple an opponent that you are hidden from, do they roll at disadvantage?Is giving one...
How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?
There is only s̶i̶x̶t̶y one place he can be
Will it be accepted, if there is no ''Main Character" stereotype?
Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing
What's a natural way to say that someone works somewhere (for a job)?
Star/Wye electrical connection math symbol
How do I rename a LINUX host without needing to reboot for the rename to take effect?
Mapping a list into a phase plot
Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?
Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle
Coordinate position not precise
What would happen if the UK refused to take part in EU Parliamentary elections?
Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?
Using parameter substitution on a Bash array
Can a monster with multiattack use this ability if they are missing a limb?
How to verify if g is a generator for p?
apt-get update is failing in debian
Finding all intervals that match predicate in vector
Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?
Print name if parameter passed to function
Best way to store options for panels
How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users
Transcription Beats per minute
How do I keep an essay about "feeling flat" from feeling flat?
If you attempt to grapple an opponent that you are hidden from, do they roll at disadvantage?
Is giving one side advantage always equivalent to giving disadvantage to the opponent?What is your chance to win in a contest where you have advantage and your opponent has disadvantage?Does advantage negate disadvantage (for things such as sneak attack)?Adding Precision Strike to an attack with advantageWhen does a hidden opponent that is attacking become visible?If you are grappled by a creature with 10'+ reach, can you make a ranged attack without disadvantage?Fighting in darkness spell. How does it work?When does a hidden opponent that is moving become visible?What issues could arise with this Advantage/Disadvantage Variant?Why is the wording different between Inquisitive and Swashbuckler Rogues' Sneak Attack-related subclass features?
$begingroup$
Quick and to the point, I'm aware that if you make an attack (which a grapple is) against an opponent you are hidden from you gain advantage, but since a grapple also is a contest roll, does the opponent also roll at disadvantage?
dnd-5e grapple stealth advantage-and-disadvantage
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Quick and to the point, I'm aware that if you make an attack (which a grapple is) against an opponent you are hidden from you gain advantage, but since a grapple also is a contest roll, does the opponent also roll at disadvantage?
dnd-5e grapple stealth advantage-and-disadvantage
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
$endgroup$
– Smart_TJ
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Quick and to the point, I'm aware that if you make an attack (which a grapple is) against an opponent you are hidden from you gain advantage, but since a grapple also is a contest roll, does the opponent also roll at disadvantage?
dnd-5e grapple stealth advantage-and-disadvantage
New contributor
$endgroup$
Quick and to the point, I'm aware that if you make an attack (which a grapple is) against an opponent you are hidden from you gain advantage, but since a grapple also is a contest roll, does the opponent also roll at disadvantage?
dnd-5e grapple stealth advantage-and-disadvantage
dnd-5e grapple stealth advantage-and-disadvantage
New contributor
New contributor
edited 59 mins ago
V2Blast
25.6k488158
25.6k488158
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
Gavin DavisGavin Davis
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
$endgroup$
– Smart_TJ
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
$endgroup$
– Smart_TJ
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
$endgroup$
– Smart_TJ
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
$endgroup$
– Smart_TJ
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
1 hour ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage
The rule for Unseen Attackers states:
When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.
The rules for Grappling state:
Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll
What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.
That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:
The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):
When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.
And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):
When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.
However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):
...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).
Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.
Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.
In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's no rule that says you do
Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.
When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.
You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...
Your DM may rule you do
From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:
The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.
This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.
At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144002%2fif-you-attempt-to-grapple-an-opponent-that-you-are-hidden-from-do-they-roll-at%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage
The rule for Unseen Attackers states:
When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.
The rules for Grappling state:
Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll
What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.
That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:
The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage
The rule for Unseen Attackers states:
When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.
The rules for Grappling state:
Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll
What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.
That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:
The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage
The rule for Unseen Attackers states:
When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.
The rules for Grappling state:
Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll
What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.
That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:
The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.
$endgroup$
Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage
The rule for Unseen Attackers states:
When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.
The rules for Grappling state:
Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll
What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.
That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:
The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.
edited 59 mins ago
V2Blast
25.6k488158
25.6k488158
answered 1 hour ago
RykaraRykara
4,7011040
4,7011040
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):
When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.
And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):
When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.
However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):
...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).
Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.
Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.
In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):
When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.
And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):
When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.
However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):
...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).
Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.
Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.
In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):
When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.
And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):
When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.
However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):
...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).
Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.
Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.
In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.
$endgroup$
No.
If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):
When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.
And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):
When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.
However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):
...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).
Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.
Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.
In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.
edited 58 mins ago
V2Blast
25.6k488158
25.6k488158
answered 1 hour ago
BloodcinderBloodcinder
23k382140
23k382140
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's no rule that says you do
Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.
When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.
You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...
Your DM may rule you do
From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:
The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.
This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.
At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's no rule that says you do
Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.
When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.
You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...
Your DM may rule you do
From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:
The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.
This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.
At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's no rule that says you do
Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.
When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.
You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...
Your DM may rule you do
From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:
The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.
This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.
At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.
$endgroup$
There's no rule that says you do
Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.
When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.
You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...
Your DM may rule you do
From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:
The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.
This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.
At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.
answered 1 hour ago
linksassinlinksassin
8,92212967
8,92212967
add a comment |
add a comment |
Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144002%2fif-you-attempt-to-grapple-an-opponent-that-you-are-hidden-from-do-they-roll-at%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
$endgroup$
– Smart_TJ
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
1 hour ago